Nosht

Dental Clinical Notes Examples: 11 Worked UK Notes

Last updated ·12 min read
N

Nosht

Published by Nosht Limited

These eleven dental clinical notes examples are written out in full, the way a UK clinician would record them, so you can see what complete documentation, aligned with GDC Standards and CGDent record-keeping guidance, looks like in practice. They cover the most common UK dental procedures — from new patient examinations to surgical extractions. Each example follows GDC Standards for the Dental Team and CGDent Clinical Examination and Record-Keeping guidelines.

Whether you are a foundation dentist building documentation habits or an experienced clinician reviewing your record-keeping, these dental notes examples provide a concrete reference for what a well-written clinical note looks like. Every example uses UK dental terminology, tooth notation, and materials you will encounter in practice.

What every dental note must include

Before looking at specific dental note examples, here is the checklist of elements that every clinical note should contain. This list is derived from GDC Standards for the Dental Team (Standard 4.1) and CGDent Clinical Examination and Record-Keeping guidelines:

  1. Date and clinician name
  2. Medical history review (changes since last visit)
  3. Presenting complaint (patient's own words)
  4. Clinical findings (including negatives)
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment options discussed (including no treatment)
  7. Risks and benefits explained
  8. Consent obtained
  9. Treatment provided (specific details)
  10. Materials used
  11. Post-operative instructions
  12. Recall/follow-up

Not every item applies to every appointment — a denture review will not require anaesthetic details, for instance — but the core structure of complaint, findings, discussion, consent, treatment, and follow-up applies to every clinical encounter. The examples below demonstrate how this checklist translates into real notes.

Example 1 — new patient examination

Use this template: Dental examination notes template · try it in the demo

The new patient examination is the most comprehensive dental note you will write. It establishes the baseline record and should cover every aspect of the patient's oral health. This dental note example demonstrates the level of detail expected:

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Nurse: [name]. New patient examination. Medical history taken — patient reports no medical conditions, no medications, NKDA. Social history: non-smoker, occasional alcohol. Extra-oral examination: TMJ — no clicking, no tenderness, no limitation of opening. Lymph nodes — NAD. Soft tissues — NAD. Intra-oral examination: Soft tissues — floor of mouth, tongue, buccal mucosa, palate — all NAD. BPE: UR 1 | UA 1 | UL 1 / LR 1 | LA 1 | LL 1. Charting completed. Caries noted UR6 MO (confirmed on the BW radiographs taken today, below). All other teeth present, no further pathology noted. Radiographs: 2x BWs taken. IR(ME)R 2017 justification: clinical suspicion of proximal caries; new patient baseline. Quality: A (diagnostically acceptable). Findings: UR6 MO radiolucency into dentine. Diagnosis: UR6 MO caries. Treatment options discussed: (1) Direct composite restoration (2) Monitor with enhanced prevention (3) No treatment. Risks and benefits of each explained. Patient opted for composite restoration. OHI given: modified Bass technique demonstrated, interdental cleaning discussed. Diet advice: reduce frequency of sugar intake. Treatment plan: UR6 MO composite. Recall: 6 months (NICE CG19 risk-based interval: active caries). Patient consented to treatment plan. Next appointment booked.

Why each section matters

This dental note example demonstrates several critical documentation principles:

  • Medical history is explicitly recorded. Stating "no medical conditions, no medications, NKDA" proves the history was taken — not just assumed. If the patient later claims they disclosed an allergy, this note provides a documented baseline.
  • Negative findings are documented. "TMJ — no clicking, no tenderness" and "Soft tissues — all NAD" prove these examinations were performed. Without these entries, there is no evidence the examinations occurred.
  • Radiographs include IR(ME)R 2017 justification and a quality rating. Under the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017, every dental radiograph must be clinically justified and quality-assessed. Recording these details is a legal requirement, not optional best practice.
  • Three treatment options are presented. Including "no treatment" as an option demonstrates that the patient was given a genuine choice. This is a core requirement of valid consent under GDC standards.
  • Oral hygiene and diet advice are recorded. Prevention is a GDC expectation. Documenting that advice was given provides evidence of a preventive approach and protects the clinician if caries progresses at a subsequent visit.

Write these in Nosht: each example on this page maps to a structured template you click through, review and copy into your PMS.

Example 2 — composite filling (direct restoration)

Use this template: Composite filling notes template · try it in the demo

Fillings are the most frequently performed restorative procedure. This dental note example for a composite restoration demonstrates the specific clinical details that should be recorded:

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Nurse: [name]. Medical history reviewed — no changes. Presenting complaint: sensitivity UR6. Clinical findings: UR6 MO caries into dentine on BW ([date]). Cold test UR6: sharp response, settles within seconds of removal. Not TTP. Diagnosis: UR6 MO caries, reversible pulpitis. Options discussed: composite / amalgam / monitor / no treatment; risks of each explained. Patient consented to MO composite. LA: 2.2ml lidocaine 2% 1:80,000 adrenaline, buccal and palatal infiltration UR6. Rubber dam placed. UR6: MO caries removed with slow-speed round bur. Cavity preparation: MO, enamel margins sound, no pulpal exposure. Selective etch, bonding agent applied (Scotchbond Universal), composite placed (3M Filtek Z250, shade A2) in incremental layers, light cured 20s per increment. Occlusion checked and adjusted. Matrix band: Palodent. Post-op instructions: avoid eating right side 2 hours, sensitivity may persist 2–4 weeks, contact if worsens. Recall: as set at the examination (NICE CG19 risk-based interval).

Key details in this dental note example: the anaesthetic type, volume, and concentration are recorded (not just "LA given"). The cavity preparation includes surfaces involved and the absence of pulpal exposure. Materials are identified by brand, type, and shade. The matrix system is named. These details matter because they allow any subsequent clinician to understand exactly what was placed — and they demonstrate a methodical approach if the restoration is later questioned.

Example 3 — simple extraction

Use this template: Simple extraction notes template · try it in the demo

Extraction notes require particular attention to consent documentation, because extractions are irreversible. This dental note example covers a straightforward forceps extraction:

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Nurse: [name]. Medical history reviewed — no changes. No anticoagulants, no bisphosphonates. Presenting complaint: recurrent pain LR6, previously root-treated, now tender to percussion. Clinical findings: LR6 — TTP, grade II mobility, deep pocket distal 8mm, radiolucency periapical on PA radiograph. Tooth non-restorable. Radiograph: PA LR6 taken. IR(ME)R 2017 justification: assessment of periapical status prior to extraction. Quality: A (diagnostically acceptable). Findings: periapical radiolucency 4mm, root filling short of apex by 3mm, no root resorption, roots non-divergent. Diagnosis: LR6 — failed root canal treatment, chronic periapical periodontitis. Treatment options discussed: (1) Extraction (2) Re-root canal treatment and possible post-crown (3) Referral to endodontist (4) No treatment — risks of leaving untreated infection. Risks and benefits of each explained. Risks of extraction discussed: pain, bleeding, swelling, infection, dry socket, damage to adjacent teeth, retained root, nerve damage (inferior alveolar nerve — risk of temporary or permanent altered sensation to lower lip and chin). Patient understood and consented to extraction. LA: 2.2ml lidocaine 2% 1:80,000 adrenaline, IDB right side. Supplemental infiltration buccal 0.5ml articaine 4% 1:100,000. LR6 extracted with lower molar forceps. Tooth delivered intact — roots checked complete. Socket inspected — no bony fragments. Haemostasis achieved with pressure on gauze pack. Post-op instructions given (verbal and written): bite on gauze 20 minutes, no rinsing 24 hours, warm salt water rinses from tomorrow, soft diet, avoid smoking, paracetamol and ibuprofen for pain relief (doses discussed), contact practice or 111 if excessive bleeding or worsening pain after 3 days. Recall: review in 1 week if concerns, otherwise routine recall at the interval set on NICE CG19 risk. Discuss replacement options (bridge, implant, RPD) at next appointment.

This dental note example is longer than the filling example because extractions carry greater medico-legal weight. The detailed consent section — listing specific risks including nerve damage — is essential. The note records that the tooth was delivered intact and roots were checked, which is important if a retained root is later discovered on radiograph. Post-operative instructions are documented as both verbal and written, providing two layers of evidence that the patient was adequately informed.

Example 4 — root canal treatment (access)

Use this template: Root canal treatment notes template

Root canal treatment is typically completed over multiple appointments. This dental note example covers the first visit — access, working length determination, and dressing:

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Nurse: [name]. Medical history reviewed — no changes. Presenting complaint: spontaneous throbbing pain UR4, keeps patient awake at night, pain on biting. Clinical findings: UR4 — large MO composite, TTP, no mobility, no swelling. Cold (Endo-Frost): sharp pain lingering more than 30 seconds after removal. EPT positive. Adjacent teeth: UR3 and UR5 respond normally to cold, no lingering pain. Radiograph: PA UR4 taken. IR(ME)R 2017 justification: assessment of root morphology and periapical status prior to RCT. Quality: A (diagnostically acceptable). Findings: deep MO restoration close to pulp, widened PDL space, no periapical radiolucency, single root visible; canal anatomy to be confirmed at access. Diagnosis: UR4 — symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with symptomatic apical periodontitis. Treatment options discussed: (1) Root canal treatment (2) Extraction and replacement (bridge/implant/RPD) (3) No treatment — risks of leaving untreated including abscess formation and spread of infection. Risks of RCT discussed: instrument fracture, perforation, incomplete treatment, need for re-treatment, tooth may still require extraction. Prognosis discussed: favourable — no periapical pathology. Patient consented to RCT. LA: 1.5ml lidocaine 2% 1:80,000 adrenaline, buccal infiltration UR4. Supplemental: intrapulpal following access. Rubber dam placed (clamp on UR4). Access cavity prepared through existing MO composite. Pulp chamber located. One canal identified; second canal searched for under magnification — none found. Pulp extirpated. Working length: electronic apex locator (Root ZX) 0.0 reading at 22.0mm; working length set at 21.5mm (0.5mm short). Confirmed with PA radiograph (WL file in situ) — quality A (diagnostically acceptable), file tip 1mm short of the radiographic apex. Canal instrumented to working length. Preparation: ProTaper Gold sequence to F2 (25/.08). Copious irrigation throughout: 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (20ml total), 17% EDTA final rinse. Canal dried with paper points. Dressing: non-setting calcium hydroxide (UltraCal XS) placed to working length. Temporary restoration: Cavit G, 4mm thickness. Patient advised: temporary filling — avoid chewing on this side, mild discomfort expected 2–3 days, ibuprofen 400mg as needed, contact if swelling develops or pain worsens significantly. Next appointment: obturation in 2–3 weeks.

Endodontic notes demand precision. This dental note example records the diagnostic tests performed (cold test, EPT, percussion) and their results, which support the diagnosis. The working length is documented with both the measurement method and the radiographic confirmation. The file system, irrigation protocol, and dressing material are all named specifically. If this case were referred for a second opinion, the receiving clinician would have a complete picture of what has been done.

Example 5 — periodontal assessment

Use this template: Periodontal assessment notes template

Periodontal notes require systematic documentation of pocket depths, bleeding, and bone levels. This dental note example follows BSP guidelines for periodontal assessment:

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Nurse: [name]. Medical history reviewed — no changes. Age 45. Patient is a smoker (10/day, 15 years). No diabetes. Presenting complaint: bleeding gums, "teeth feel loose". BPE: UR 4 | UA 3 | UL 3 / LR 4* | LA 3 | LL 3. Full periodontal charting completed (6-point pocket chart). Findings summary: generalised pocketing 4–5mm. Localised deep pockets: UR6 disto-buccal 7mm, UR7 mesio-palatal 6mm, LR6 disto-buccal 8mm, LR7 disto-lingual 6mm. Generalised bleeding on probing (BOP 65%). Generalised supra- and subgingival calculus. Grade II mobility LR6. Recession: generalised 1–2mm buccally, LR6 buccal 3mm. Furcation involvement: LR6 grade II buccal. Radiographs: DPT and PA LR6 taken. IR(ME)R 2017 justification: assessment of bone levels for periodontal diagnosis. Quality: A (diagnostically acceptable). Findings: generalised horizontal bone loss — 30–40% in molar regions, localised vertical defect distal LR6 with bone loss to the apical third of the root (approx. 70%) — worst site. Diagnosis: Generalised periodontitis Stage IV Grade C — currently unstable (PPD ≥5mm) — risk factors: smoker 10/day. Stage from the worst site (LR6 distal, bone loss to the apical third of the root); grade from % bone loss ÷ age at that site (70% ÷ age 45 = 1.6, above 1.0). Classification per BSP implementation of the 2017 World Workshop. Treatment plan discussed: Step 1 — Cause-related therapy: OHI (interdental brushes sized and demonstrated, technique coaching), smoking cessation advice and referral offered, supragingival debridement (2 appointments). Step 2 — Reassessment at 8 weeks: re-chart, assess tissue response, determine need for subgingival instrumentation. Step 3 — Subgingival instrumentation under LA of residual pockets >5mm (if indicated after reassessment). Step 4 — Re-assessment and supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) or referral to periodontist for LR6 if pocket depth does not reduce. Risks discussed: tooth loss if untreated (particularly LR6), continued bone loss, recession following treatment (aesthetic change, sensitivity), LR6 prognosis guarded due to furcation and mobility. Patient understood. OHI: TePe interdental brushes — sizes demonstrated and fitted (pink 0.4mm anteriors, red 0.5mm premolars, blue 0.6mm molars). Modified Bass technique reviewed. Smoking cessation: brief intervention given, NHS quit referral offered — patient declined at present. Patient consented to Step 1 treatment plan. Next appointment: supragingival debridement session 1 in 2 weeks.

Periodontal documentation is among the most scrutinised in dental litigation. This dental note example uses the current BSP/World Workshop classification rather than outdated terminology, in the order of the BSP diagnosis statement: extent, stage, grade, current stability and risk factors. Under the BSP implementation there is one stage per patient, set by the worst site, and the grade comes from % bone loss ÷ age at that site; smoking is recorded as a risk factor. The treatment plan follows the stepwise approach recommended by BSP guidelines, and each step is clearly documented. Recording the specific interdental brush sizes demonstrates individualised preventive care, and the smoking cessation discussion — including the patient's refusal — protects the clinician.

Example 6 — emergency appointment (toothache)

Use this template: Emergency appointment notes template

Emergency appointments require focused documentation: a clear history of the presenting complaint, targeted investigations, a working diagnosis, and the treatment provided. This dental note example covers an acute toothache presentation:

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Nurse: [name]. Emergency appointment. Medical history reviewed — no changes. No relevant medications, NKDA. History of presenting complaint: patient reports severe pain lower left, started 3 days ago, initially intermittent now constant. Pain described as throbbing, radiating to ear, disturbing sleep. Pain worsened by hot, relieved slightly by cold. Patient taking ibuprofen 400mg and paracetamol 500mg alternating — partial relief only. No swelling reported. No trismus. No fever. Clinical findings: LL7 — large distal caries extending subgingivally. TTP. No response to cold (Endo-Frost). No response to EPT. No mobility. No swelling, no sinus tract, no lymphadenopathy. Adjacent LL6 and LL8 vital, respond normally to cold. Radiograph: PA LL7 taken. IR(ME)R 2017 justification: localisation and assessment of periapical status. Quality: A (diagnostically acceptable). Findings: large distal radiolucency into pulp, periapical radiolucency 3mm diameter, no root resorption, two roots (mesial and distal), canals appear patent. Diagnosis: LL7 — pulp necrosis with acute apical periodontitis (symptomatic). Differential diagnosis considered: cracked tooth syndrome (no crack line visible, no pain on biting test with Tooth Slooth), acute periodontal abscess (no deep pocketing, BPE 1 in that sextant). Treatment options discussed: (1) Extirpation and dressing today, followed by RCT (2) Extraction (3) Antibiotics only (explained this is not appropriate without signs of spreading infection — no swelling, no fever, no trismus). Patient opted for extirpation with a view to completing RCT. LA: 2.2ml articaine 4% 1:100,000 adrenaline, IDB left side. Supplemental long buccal 0.5ml. Rubber dam placed (clamp LL7). Access cavity prepared. Pulp necrotic — purulent discharge from canals on access. Two canals located (mesial, distal). Canals irrigated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. Gross debridement of necrotic tissue. Working lengths not determined at this visit (emergency drainage only). Canals left open to drain under rubber dam for 5 minutes, then dressed with non-setting calcium hydroxide (UltraCal XS). Temporary restoration: Cavit G. Analgesia advice: continue ibuprofen 400mg and paracetamol 500mg (alternating, every 4 hours). No antibiotics prescribed — no systemic signs of infection (FGDP antimicrobial prescribing guidelines). Contact practice or 111 if swelling develops or pain does not improve within 48 hours. Next appointment: RCT visit 1 (WL determination, instrumentation) in 1 week.

This dental note example demonstrates two important principles. First, the differential diagnosis section shows clinical reasoning — you considered and excluded other possibilities, not just jumped to a conclusion. Second, the explicit note about not prescribing antibiotics (with reference to FGDP guidelines) protects the clinician against any suggestion that antimicrobials were inappropriately withheld. In emergency appointments, documenting what you did not do — and why — is as important as documenting what you did.

Example 7 — crown preparation

Use this template: Crown preparation notes template

Crown preparations involve multiple stages and materials. This dental note example covers the preparation appointment including shade selection, impression, and temporary crown:

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Nurse: [name]. Medical history reviewed — no changes. Presenting complaint: UR5 — previously root-treated, large existing composite failing (marginal discolouration, secondary caries). Treatment plan agreed at previous appointment: full-coverage porcelain-bonded crown (PBC) UR5. Consent re-confirmed today. Risks re-discussed: sensitivity (unlikely given RCT), fracture of preparation, need for post in future, aesthetic outcome may not match perfectly, temporary crown may dislodge. Shade selection: Vita Classical shade guide — A2 body, A1 incisal. Photographs taken for laboratory (with and without shade tab). LA: 1.0ml lidocaine 2% 1:80,000 adrenaline, buccal infiltration UR5 (for soft tissue management). Retraction cord placed (Ultrapak #00, no medicament). UR5 preparation: existing composite and secondary caries removed. Preparation for full-coverage PBC — 1.5mm occlusal reduction, 1.0mm axial reduction, chamfer finish line, margins supragingival buccally, equigingival palatally. All enamel margins smooth and continuous. No undercuts. Preparation checked with silicone index from diagnostic wax-up. Impression: upper — addition-cured silicone (Aquasil Ultra), two-stage putty-wash technique. Lower — alginate (Blueprint Cremix). Bite registration: Futar D. Impressions checked: full arch recorded, preparation margins clearly visible, no voids, no tears, no distortion. Temporary crown: fabricated chairside from Protemp 4 (shade A2) using silicone matrix. Margins adapted and polished. Cemented with TempBond NE. Occlusion checked in ICP and lateral excursions — no interferences. Post-op instructions: temporary crown is provisional — avoid sticky foods, do not floss aggressively around temporary, contact if temporary dislodges (re-cement, do not leave off). Maintain normal oral hygiene otherwise. Laboratory prescription completed: PBC UR5, Vita A2 body / A1 incisal, photographs and silicone index sent. Fit appointment in 2 weeks.

This dental note example records every material by name and specification — from the impression material and technique to the temporary crown material and cement. The shade is recorded with body and incisal values. Impression quality is assessed and documented. These details are important because crown work frequently generates patient complaints about fit and aesthetics, and the clinical record is the first document an indemnity provider will review.

Example 8 — denture review

Use this template: Denture review notes template

Denture review appointments are often documented briefly — but they carry the same record-keeping requirements as any other clinical encounter. This dental note example covers a review following a new denture fit:

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Nurse: [name]. Medical history reviewed — no changes. Review appointment: upper and lower acrylic partial dentures fitted 2 weeks ago. Patient reports: generally satisfied with upper denture, comfortable, retention good, eating well. Lower denture: discomfort on right side, rubbing on lower ridge, difficulty eating hard foods on right. Clinical findings: upper denture — seating fully, no rocking, flanges adequate, occlusion stable in ICP. Soft tissues under upper denture — NAD, no erythema, no ulceration. Lower denture — seating fully, pressure area identified: lingual flange right premolar region (erythematous area on ridge, no ulceration). Mild overextension of lingual flange in this area. Occlusion: slight premature contact on the LR5 denture tooth in lateral excursion. Adjustments made: lower denture — lingual flange reduced in right premolar region using acrylic trimming bur, polished smooth. Occlusal adjustment: LR5 (denture tooth) buccal cusp reduced minimally to eliminate lateral interference. Checked with articulating paper — even contacts achieved in ICP and excursions. Pressure-indicating paste used to locate the pressure area before adjustment. Patient advised to return sooner if further soreness. Denture hygiene instructions reinforced: remove dentures at night, brush dentures with denture brush and soap (not toothpaste), soak in denture cleaning solution, brush natural teeth and ridges before reinserting. Reviewed importance of keeping dentures out overnight for tissue health. Patient satisfied with adjustments. Comfort improved on reinsertion. Next appointment: further review in 1 week, or sooner if problems persist. Long-term recall: at the interval set on NICE CG19 risk (combined with dental examination).

Even for a straightforward denture review, this dental note example records what the patient reported, what was found clinically, what adjustments were made and where, the specific location of the pressure area, and that denture hygiene advice was given. If denture problems recur or the patient later claims they were not seen for review, this note provides complete documentation of the appointment.

Example 9 — recall examination (recall interval rationale)

Use this template: Routine examination notes template · try it in the demo

A recall examination is where the next recall interval is set, and NICE CG19 asks for that interval to be reasoned, not defaulted. The guideline says the interval between oral health reviews “should be determined specifically for each patient” from an assessment of disease levels and risk (1.1.1), and that the dentist should discuss it with the patient and “record this interval, and the patient’s agreement or disagreement with it” (1.1.7). The shortest interval is 3 months; the longest is 24 months for patients aged 18 and over and 12 months for patients under 18 (1.1.5).

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Recall examination; last seen [date], recall interval then set at 12 months. Medical history reviewed — no changes. No new medications. Smoking status: non-smoker. Dental attendance and home care: brushes twice daily with fluoride toothpaste; interdental cleaning most days. Extra-oral: NAD. Intra-oral soft tissues: NAD. Teeth: no new caries, no new restorations needed; existing restorations sound. BPE: 1 1 2 / 1 1 1; no pockets over 3.5mm. Risk assessment for recall interval (NICE CG19 1.1.3): caries — no new or active lesions since last review, diet reviewed; periodontal — BPE maximum 2, plaque control reported as consistent; no tobacco or alcohol concerns recorded; patient able to attend at the recommended interval. Recommended recall interval: 12 months, chosen on the assessment above. Discussed with patient, who agrees. Interval to be reviewed at the next oral health review and shortened if disease or risk changes.

The point of this example is the last two paragraphs: the note shows what the interval was based on, that it was discussed, and that the patient agreed. A bare “Recall: 12 months” does not show any of that. Source: NICE CG19, Dental checks: intervals between oral health reviews (recommendations 1.1.1 to 1.1.8, published October 2004, checked 22 October 2026).

Example 10 — child examination (fluoride and prevention advice)

Use this template: Child examination notes template

A child’s record needs the same elements as an adult’s plus who gave consent, who attended with the child, and the prevention advice given to the parent or carer. The advice in the note below follows the 3 to 6 years table of the national prevention toolkit, Delivering better oral health: brushing by or with a parent or carer at least twice a day, last thing at night and on one other occasion, with toothpaste containing at least 1,000ppm fluoride, a pea-sized amount, spitting out rather than rinsing; fluoride varnish (2.26% NaF) two times a year; and a recall interval of 3 to 12 months based on oral health needs and disease risk.

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Child examination. Patient aged 5, accompanied by mother (parental responsibility confirmed). Consent for examination given by mother; child cooperative. Medical history reviewed with mother — no conditions, no medications, no allergies. Dental history: first visit since age 3. Diet: sugary drinks at mealtimes only; no bottle or night-time drinks other than water. Extra-oral: NAD. Intra-oral soft tissues: NAD. Primary dentition complete, 20 teeth present. No caries detected, no restorations. Plaque: moderate, generalised, worse posteriorly. Gingivae: mild marginal redness, no swelling. Prevention advice given to mother and child: tooth brushing twice daily, last thing at night and on one other occasion, with a pea-sized amount of toothpaste containing at least 1,000ppm fluoride; mother to assist or supervise; spit out after brushing, do not rinse. Sugary food and drink limited to mealtimes. Written advice given. Fluoride varnish offered and mother consented; 2.26% NaF applied to all teeth; post-application instructions given. Fluoride varnish to be applied twice a year. Recall interval: 6 months, based on plaque level and diet; mother in agreement.

Source: DHSC and NHS England, Delivering better oral health, chapter 2: summary guidance tables for dental teams (updated 10 September 2025, checked 22 October 2026), table 1b. For children with a higher caries risk the same chapter recommends toothpaste containing 1,350 to 1,500ppm fluoride and fluoride varnish two or more times a year, so adjust the note to the child’s risk and record the reason.

Example 11 — hygienist visit (BPE, oral hygiene instruction and PMPR)

Use this template: Scale and polish notes template · try it in the demo

A hygienist’s note should stand on its own: who the patient was seen by and how they came to be seen, the BPE, what was done and what happens next. The GDC’s direct access page says that every dental professional is responsible for keeping accurate patient records, and that if a patient needs to be referred, relevant clinical information should go with the referral. The BSP BPE guidance (January 2019) sets the minimum follow-up for each code: for code 3, initial therapy including self-care advice (oral hygiene instruction and risk factor control) and then, after that therapy, a 6-point pocket chart of that sextant only, with radiographs available for every code 3 and code 4 sextant.

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name], dental hygienist. Patient seen on referral from [dentist name] / self-presented under direct access [delete as applicable]. Medical history reviewed — no changes. Smoking: non-smoker. Consent: verbal consent for periodontal assessment and professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) obtained. BPE: 2 2 3 / 2 2 2. Code 3 in UL sextant, no furcation involvement noted. Radiographs for UL sextant: available from [date]; no new radiographs taken today. Treatment: oral hygiene instruction — interdental brushes demonstrated, patient demonstrated technique, size [x] recommended; risk factor control discussed. PMPR supra- and subgingival, full mouth, hand and ultrasonic instruments; local anaesthetic not required. Plaque and bleeding scores recorded before and after. Plan: initial therapy delivered today for UL sextant; after the initial therapy, 6-point pocket chart of the UL sextant only at the next visit. Findings and BPE sent to [dentist name]. Next hygiene visit: [interval] with the dentist’s examination at the NICE CG19 interval set for this patient.

Sources: BSP, The Basic Periodontal Examination (BPE), 2019; GDC, Direct access (checked 22 October 2026). For the codes and actions in full, see the BPE scoring guide.

Documenting an adverse event

When something goes wrong with a patient’s treatment, the GDC’s guidance on being open and honest (the professional duty of candour, effective 1 July 2016) says you must tell the patient, apologise, offer an appropriate remedy or support to put matters right if possible, and explain fully the short and long term effects of what has happened. It also says: “You should record your discussion with the patient” in their notes, and “Record your apology in the patient’s notes.” An apology is not the same as admitting legal liability, according to the same guidance.

Date: [date]. Clinician: [name]. Adverse event during root canal treatment, LR6. What happened: a fractured instrument fragment was identified in the mesiobuccal canal at [time]. Treatment paused. Patient informed at the time, in clear terms, that the instrument had fractured and that the fragment remains in the canal. Apology given in person by [name], personal to the patient and to what had happened. Short and long term effects explained, including the options available now (continue treatment as far as possible, refer, or review). Patient’s questions: [recorded]. Patient’s decision: [recorded]. Contact for further questions given. Follow-up arrangements: [date]. Written follow-up sent: [yes/no]. Radiograph taken after the event with its justification: [recorded].

Record the event in the clinical record, not only in an incident log, and write it at the time. Source: GDC, The professional duty of candour: Being open and honest with patients when something goes wrong (effective from 1 July 2016, checked 22 October 2026). Your indemnifier can advise on a specific incident; this page is not legal advice.

Common mistakes to avoid

Even experienced clinicians fall into documentation habits that weaken their records. Having reviewed the dental notes examples above, here are the most common mistakes to avoid:

  1. Writing "LA given" without details. This tells a reader nothing useful. Write the agent, concentration, volume, vasoconstrictor, and injection technique: "2.2ml lidocaine 2% 1:80,000 adrenaline, IDB right side." If a patient experiences prolonged numbness or an adverse reaction, the specific anaesthetic record is essential.
  2. Omitting consent documentation. "Filling done" does not evidence that the patient consented to the filling or was informed of alternatives. Record what options were discussed, what risks were explained, and that the patient agreed. Consent must be documented for every intervention, not assumed.
  3. Recording only positive findings. If your note says "caries UR6" and nothing else, there is no evidence you examined the rest of the mouth. Recording "all other teeth present, no further pathology noted" or listing negative findings for soft tissues and TMJ demonstrates a thorough examination.
  4. Using vague terms instead of specifics. "Composite placed" should be "3M Filtek Z250, shade A2, placed in incremental layers, light cured 20s per increment." Vague notes suggest vague clinical care, even when the treatment was excellent.
  5. Forgetting post-operative instructions. If a patient calls at 10pm with post-extraction bleeding and claims they were not told what to do, the note needs to show that post-operative instructions were given — ideally both verbal and written. "Post-op instructions given" as a single line is better than nothing, but listing the key points is better still.
  6. Not recording "no treatment" as a discussed option. The GDC expects patients to be offered the option of no treatment with an explanation of the consequences. Omitting this from your treatment options list is a common oversight that weakens consent documentation.

How Nosht helps you write notes like these

Every dental note example on this page follows a consistent structure — because consistent structure is what produces complete records. That is exactly what a dental notes app like Nosht does. Instead of typing notes from memory (and hoping you remember everything), you select from structured, treatment-specific templates that prompt for every section shown in the examples above.

Anaesthetic details, consent discussions, material selections, post-operative instructions, and recall arrangements are all built into each template. You click through options, the note builds itself, and you copy it into your practice management system with one click. No dictation and no audio capture; the template output is deterministic (no AI interpretation in that path), with an optional, clinician-reviewed AI shorthand fill you review (trial or Pro; filling, extraction, crown and inlay/onlay templates — see how Nosht uses AI). No patient identifiers in clinical notes (referral letters and leaflet sending excepted).

If these dental notes examples represent the standard you want to achieve, Get Started — From £9.99/month and see how structured templates make it automatic.

Frequently asked questions

How do you write dental notes?

Write dental notes contemporaneously — during or immediately after treatment. Start with the date, clinician name, and medical history review. Record the presenting complaint in the patient's own words, then document clinical findings (including relevant negatives), diagnosis, treatment options discussed (with risks and benefits), consent obtained, treatment provided with specific details and materials, post-operative instructions given, and recall arrangements. Follow the GDC Standards for the Dental Team and CGDent (formerly FGDP(UK)) Clinical Examination and Record-Keeping guidelines as your framework.

What is a good example of a dental examination note?

A good dental examination note includes: date and clinician, medical history taken or reviewed, extra-oral examination (TMJ, lymph nodes, soft tissues), intra-oral examination (soft tissues, BPE scores, charting), radiographs taken with IR(ME)R 2017 justification and quality rating (A/N), diagnoses identified, treatment options discussed with risks and benefits, oral hygiene and diet advice given, treatment plan agreed, consent obtained, and recall interval set. Every section should be documented even when findings are normal — recording "NAD" (nothing abnormal detected) demonstrates the examination was performed.

How detailed should dental notes be?

Dental notes should be detailed enough that another competent clinician could understand what was found, what was discussed, what was done, and what was planned — without needing to ask the original clinician. Medico-legal advisers often say "if it isn't recorded, it didn't happen": without a record you cannot evidence the care you gave. GDC Standard 4.1 requires contemporaneous, complete and accurate records. Specific details matter: record "2.2ml lidocaine 2% with 1:80,000 adrenaline, IDB right side" rather than "LA given". Record "3M Filtek Z250, shade A2" rather than "composite placed". These details protect you in complaints and demonstrate a standard of care.

Should dental notes include negative findings?

Yes. Recording negative findings (also called relevant negatives or pertinent negatives) is essential. Documenting "TMJ — no clicking, no tenderness, no limitation of opening" proves the examination was performed and no pathology was found. If you only record positive findings, there is no way to distinguish between a negative result and a missed examination. In a complaint or FtP investigation, a missing finding is hard to defend.

Write notes like these in a fraction of the clicks.Start free trialTry the free notation converter

Related articles

Sources

N

Nosht

Published by Nosht Limited

Nosht Limited makes structured clinical note templates for UK dental professionals. Articles refer to guidance from the GDC, CGDent, BSP, SDCEP and NICE. Check the current version of a source before relying on it.

Three ways to start with Nosht

Try the live demo

See the templates in action — no account, no card.

Open the demo →

Download the Composite Filling template — free

Enter your email for the print-ready pack: a PDF to print and a Word file to edit, plus the plain text to paste into your PMS. It lands in your inbox, and the PDF downloads right away.

Ready to write defensible notes?

3-day free trial for new subscribers. Card required; cancel before your 3-day trial ends and you won't be charged. 50 GDC-aligned templates. No patient identifiers in clinical notes (referral letters and leaflet sending excepted). From £9.99/month.

Start free trial →

Hygienist or therapist? Dental hygienist & therapist notes app →