Nosht

The IR(ME)R-Compliant Dental Radiograph Report Template

Last updated ·5 min read·Examination
N

Nosht

Published by Nosht Limited

Failing to record a clinical evaluation of a radiograph breaches IR(ME)R 2017 reg 12(9) — exposing patients to ionising radiation without recording the diagnostic outcome. Below is a template for UK clinicians to paste into their PMS for every radiograph exposure.

Download the Radiograph Report template — free

Enter your email for the print-ready pack: a PDF to print and a Word file to edit, plus the plain text to paste into your PMS. It lands in your inbox, and the PDF downloads right away.

Why this radiograph report template wins

  • IR(ME)R 2017 justification recorded explicitly — the legal precondition for exposure, and an easily missed element.
  • Quality grade (A/N) per the 2020 Guidance Notes (PHE/FGDP(UK)) — repeat radiograph audit relies on this.
  • Structured report sections — never leave findings ambiguous. Crowns / roots / periapical / bone / other — covers every diagnostic question.
  • Reporter explicitly named — for OPG and CBCT often reported by a separate clinician; the template makes attribution clear.
  • CBCT dose line — dose reference level (DRL) compliance is a key CBCT audit item.

The template (paste into your PMS notes field)

Paste the radiograph report template below into your PMS notes field. Patient demographics are left out because your PMS already holds them.

RADIOGRAPH TYPE: [PA / BW / Occlusal / OPG / Cephalometric / CBCT]
PROJECTION / SITE: [Tooth / sextant / region]

JUSTIFICATION (IR(ME)R 2017): [Specific clinical question — e.g. "Caries assessment, 18-month interval, asymptomatic" / "Periapical status pre-RCT" / "Endodontic working length"]
Alternative imaging considered: [Periapical sufficient / CBCT not justified — dose vs benefit]

QUALITY GRADE: [A — acceptable / N — not acceptable, with reason; record why if an N image is not retaken]
Quality issues (if N): [Positioning / exposure / movement / processing]

REPORT (structured findings):
- Crowns of teeth: [Caries — depth, surface, FDI / restorations / no abnormality]
- Roots: [Length / curvature / resorption / fracture]
- Periapical: [Lamina dura intact / widened PDL / periapical radiolucency — size]
- Bone: [Levels — generalised loss % / localised loss / sclerosis / radiolucency]
- Other structures: [Sinuses / IAN canal / mental foramen / TMJ / pathology — incidental findings]

INTERPRETATION / DIAGNOSIS LINKED TO CLINIC:

REPORTING CLINICIAN: [Self — same clinician as referrer / clinical lead reporter for OPG / specialist for CBCT]
REPORT DATE: [Same day if at exposure / specify if reported later]

DOSE NOTES (CBCT only): [DRL — within acceptable limits / dose to patient documented]

REFERRER (if different from reporter):
ACTION TAKEN: [Treatment plan informed / specialist referral / repeat radiograph in __ months]

Try the radiograph report note in the live demo → No account needed.

What good looks like — a worked example

The same radiograph report template, completed for a realistic case.

RADIOGRAPH TYPE: Posterior bitewings (R + L)
PROJECTION / SITE: Posterior teeth, both sides

JUSTIFICATION (IR(ME)R 2017): Caries assessment at routine recall. Previous BWs 18 months ago. Moderate caries risk patient — interval per FGDP selection criteria. Patient asymptomatic.
Alternative imaging considered: BWs are the indicated view for interproximal caries assessment.

QUALITY GRADE: A (acceptable — both films diagnostic, all contacts open, full coverage of crowns to alveolar bone crest)
Quality issues: None.

REPORT (structured findings):
- Crowns of teeth: UR6 — distal restoration, no 2° caries. UL6 — sound. UR5 — early enamel-only mesial caries, no dentine penetration. UL5 — sound. UL4 — DO composite, margins intact. Lower posteriors all sound.
- Roots: Not assessed (BW projection).
- Periapical: Not fully visualised (BW projection).
- Bone: Alveolar crests at CEJ generally. Slight horizontal bone loss LL sextant (~10% root length). UR and UL stable.
- Other structures: Maxillary sinus floor visible UR6 region — clear. No incidental findings.

INTERPRETATION / DIAGNOSIS LINKED TO CLINIC: UR5 enamel-only mesial caries — monitor + prevention (no operative intervention needed at this stage). All other restorations stable. Bone loss LL sextant consistent with previous BPE 3 — supportive periodontal care continuing.

REPORTING CLINICIAN: Self (referrer and reporter the same).
REPORT DATE: Today, same appointment.

ACTION TAKEN: Monitor UR5 with photographs (taken today). Reinforce prevention. Recall 9 months (caries M, perio L).

Compliance: the medico-legal angle

  • IR(ME)R 2017 reg 11 — each exposure justified and authorised before it is taken. The justification line satisfies this.
  • IR(ME)R 2017 reg 12(9) — a clinical evaluation of every exposure must be recorded. Structured report + interpretation lines.
  • Quality grading — 2020 Guidance Notes (PHE/FGDP(UK)) and your QA programme; IRR 2017 covers equipment and dose, not image grading.
  • CGDent/FGDP Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography (2018) — when to take what radiograph. The template assumes justification per this guidance.
  • GDC Principle 4 — contemporaneous, complete record. Failing to record a clinical evaluation breaches IR(ME)R 2017 reg 12(9).

Common documentation mistakes

  • Taking a radiograph and not writing a report — failing to record a clinical evaluation breaches IR(ME)R 2017 reg 12(9).
  • Justification reading "routine" or "ortho purpose" — needs a SPECIFIC clinical question (caries assessment / WL / periapical status).
  • No A/N quality grade recorded — audit can't track repeat rates without it.
  • CBCT taken without justifying the dose vs an alternative 2D view — IRR 2017 ALARP principle requires this.
  • Reporter same as referrer not stated for OPG/CBCT — leaves attribution ambiguous if a finding is missed.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

What's IR(ME)R (often written IRMER) and why does it matter?

Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 — the UK law that governs medical radiation exposure including dental radiographs. Three duty holders: the referrer (who requests), the practitioner (who justifies), and the operator (who exposes and processes). Every exposure requires documented justification before exposure and a documented report after. Failure to comply is a criminal offence as well as a GDC fitness-to-practise risk.

How specific does the justification need to be?

Specific enough that an inspector reading the note understands the clinical question. "Routine" is not justification. "Bitewing for caries assessment, 18-month interval, moderate caries risk patient, asymptomatic" IS justification. Same for endo: "Working length determination, UR1, file at apex confirmed."

What's the difference between justification and reporting?

Justification is the clinical reason BEFORE you press the button (IR(ME)R Reg.11). Reporting is the documented interpretation AFTER you see the image (IR(ME)R Reg.12). Both are mandatory. The template captures both in one note.

Do I need to report a radiograph if the finding is "all normal"?

Yes — "all normal" is itself a finding and must be documented. "Crowns sound, no caries, bone levels normal, no periapical pathology" is a valid report. The IR(ME)R duty is to document, not to find pathology.

What about CBCT — different rules?

CBCT delivers a higher dose than 2D radiographs and must be justified against 2D alternatives. IR(ME)R 2017 regulation 12 (doses kept as low as reasonably practicable, ALARP) requires documented consideration of whether a 2D periapical or panoramic would answer the clinical question. CBCT also requires dose reference level (DRL) compliance documentation.

Who can report an OPG or CBCT?

OPG: any IR(ME)R-trained dentist (your training covered this). CBCT: a clinician trained in CBCT interpretation — many dentists refer CBCTs out for specialist reporting. The reporter must be named in the note. Reporting a CBCT outside your competence is a GDC scope issue.

Patient leaflets for this treatment

Browse the full set of free dental notes templates.

N

Nosht

Published by Nosht Limited

Nosht Limited makes structured clinical note templates for UK dental professionals. Articles refer to guidance from the GDC, CGDent, BSP, SDCEP and NICE. Check the current version of a source before relying on it.

Two ways to start with Nosht

Try the live demo

See the templates in action — no account, no card.

Open the demo →

Ready to write defensible notes?

3-day free trial for new subscribers. Card required; cancel before your 3-day trial ends and you won't be charged. 50 GDC-aligned templates. No patient identifiers in clinical notes (referral letters and leaflet sending excepted). From £9.99/month.

Start free trial →

Hygienist or therapist? Dental hygienist & therapist notes app →